For Reviewers

• Reviewers should agree to review articles related to their area of expertise.
• Reviewers should refuse to evaluate the manuscript if they think there is a conflict of interest and inform the Editorial Board’ .
• Reviewers should evaluate the manuscript objectively to contribute to the editor’s decision-making process, provide guidance to help improve the quality of the manuscript, and conduct this process confidentially.
• Reviewers should make their evaluations away from personal comments, in accordance with academic rules and in a constructive language.
• Reviewers should forward their suggestions for corrections on the evaluation form and/or the text to the Editorial Board via the journal management system to be forwarded to the author(s).
• Reviewers should evaluate the article within the time given to them.
• The issues that the referees should pay attention to while uploading the Reviewer Reports to the journal system are stated below;

-    The name of the reviewer should not appear in the detailed note to the editor or author.
-     You should write your comments and suggestions for corrections by opening the “Comment” box on the article text.
-    In order to ensure that the process between the reviewer(s) and the author(s) can be double-blinded with anonymity, the reviewer’s name should not appear in the “Comment” boxes you open on the manuscript text.